Too Good Explicit by Drake

Now Playing

Drake Too Good Explicit
Alicie Keys, Nicki Minaj and Beyonce

The ink has barely dried on Jay Z's $56 million dollar acquisition, but TIDAL is already in full PR mode. 

With the launch event taking place late yesterday, the first wave of criticisms are in. The service, which will rely almost exclusively on user subscription (at a going rate of $20/per month), has so far failed to resonate with its target. 


In possibly the biggest and most ostentatious show of clout, Jay Z rounded up all of his famous friends for a repositioning exercise that seems both gratuitous and laughably misguided--even for this particular group of celebrities. 

In the promotional video, the biggest names in popular music sit around a table speaking in hyperbole about "the future of music" and "changing the game" while completely missing the point of the thing they proclaim to love so much: music. 

We didn't like the direction music was going and thought maybe we could get in and strike an honest blow and if the very least we did was make people wake up and try to improve the free-versus-paid system, and promote fair trade, then it would be a win for us anyway.

Jay Z

tidal for all 

TIDAL is not revolutionary

One look at the video "likes" bar will say it all. People aren't sold on the idea of #TIDALforALL. 

At its very core, TIDAL is a music streaming service. There isn't very much that's revolutionary about something that costs a great deal more money to play CD quality music. CDs aren't some archaic music delivery system. You can still buy them in stores.

Don't get us wrong, Spotify's model isn't great. While we don't agree with paying unreasonable prices for designer music subscription services, Spotify's artist royalties are abysmal. We want our favourite artists to get paid but TIDALS' model relies too heavily on the assumption that "artists for artists" will inspire people to fork over a massive chunk of their hard earned money. 

Alicie Keys, Nicki Minaj and Beyonce

TIDAL missed their base by a mile

It's hard to convince music fans that they should all flock to a service without a free option simply because Jay and Bey said so. In fact, it's hard to sing the lines "I guess sometimes sh*t goes down when there's a billion dollars on an elevator" in one breath and ask for $240 a year in the next breath. 

The nature of the music industry is such that fans are keenly aware of their favourite artist's net worth, making this whole thing all the more awkward. 

According to a Yougov profile of Beyonce fans, members of the singer's base say they have less than £125 left over at the end of each month. It also says that Beyonce fans are, on average, between the ages of 18-24 (which is a demographic that could probably be extended to include Rihanna, Nicki Minaj, DeadMau5 etc.). If your core base admit they have little to no money at the end of the month, is a high end music streaming service at the top of their priority list? 

Users want social justice, not just more of the same

Criticism of the TIDAL launch has revealed something else about the platform of mainstream musicianship. Users are increasingly pointing out that they wish their favourite artists were involved in social justice causes instead of lining their pockets. 

While fans should welcome new and innovative ways of music delivery, TIDAL is not the answer. The roll out was rushed, the USP is shaky at best, and the base has all but disappeared out from under them. TIDAL is, in actuality, a TIDAL wave of bad ideas. 


Have your say

Kanye West and Kim Kardashian BRIT Awards 2015

Here's Why Kanye West Should Have Said No To Performing At The BRITs

Kanye West Live

A Brave Man Has Come Up With A Way To Stop Kanye West Performing At Glastonbury

Jay Z Beyonce

Jay Z And Beyonce Looked Horrified When Kanye West Nearly Crashed The Grammys Stage

Tay Jay

Taylor Swift And Jay Z Have Partnered Up On Something HUGE